Gigabyte B450 AORUS PRO WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics70.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive144% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte B450 AORUS PRO WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte B450 AORUS PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory6.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220720
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 26 '22 at 00:29
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$119
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Memory 81.9
1-Core 159
2-Core 307
98% 182 Pts
4-Core 594
8-Core 914
93% 754 Pts
64-Core 1,061
66% 1,061 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Lighting 94
Reflection 90.5
Parallax 78.9
77% 87.8 fps
MRender 65.6
Gravity 80
Splatting 72.4
60% 72.7 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG SPECTRIX S40G 512GB
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VB421D57
SusWrite @10s intervals: 430 526 232 183 158 185 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
144% Outstanding
Read 1259
Write 936
Mixed 856
SusWrite 285
186% 834 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 60.3
4K Mixed 41.4
136% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,106
DQ Write 426
DQ Mixed 287
338% 606 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 144%
Great: 309%
Mushkin MKNSSDRE960GB 960GB
279GB free
Firmware: P1003B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 382 394 406 404 23 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 461
Write 361
Mixed 281
SusWrite 332
80% 359 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 59.8
4K Mixed 25.9
86% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 76.4
96% 168 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 95%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$182
2TB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 147 148 152 151 144 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 149
Write 143
Mixed 114
SusWrite 149
103% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1
209% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 98%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
195GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 160 159 160 159 154 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 136
Write 143
Mixed 88.2
SusWrite 158
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 112%
Mg04aca6 00E 6TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0114
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 40 41 41 41 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Read 53.4
Write 37.2
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 40.2
30% 40.2 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1
440% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL18-20-20 D4-3600 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 30.6
87% 30.4 GB/s
SC Read 29
SC Write 32.1
SC Mixed 31.2
88% 30.8 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450 AORUS PRO WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 7,380 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450 AORUS PRO WIFI - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $875
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback