Asus PRIME Z390-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics46.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive211% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z390-P  (all builds)
Memory21.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211012
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateDec 09 '22 at 09:54
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$137
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Memory 89
1-Core 136
2-Core 264
90% 163 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 556
71% 535 Pts
64-Core 626
39% 626 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.2% Average
Lighting 57.5
Reflection 60.2
Parallax 80.3
47% 66 fps
MRender 60.4
Gravity 64.7
Splatting 44.2
45% 56.4 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
575GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1108 1129 1126 1180 1156 1079 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 1,289
Write 1,130
Mixed 1,089
SusWrite 1,130
261% 1,160 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 76.2
4K Mixed 59.2
186% 60.5 MB/s
DQ Read 830
DQ Write 634
DQ Mixed 704
534% 723 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 211%
Great: 372%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150
298GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1716 1576 1567 1570 1575 1568 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
275% Outstanding
Read 2,104
Write 1,785
Mixed 1,524
SusWrite 1,596
393% 1,752 MB/s
4K Read 49.9
4K Write 85.9
4K Mixed 61.5
200% 65.8 MB/s
DQ Read 829
DQ Write 583
DQ Mixed 706
527% 706 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 275%
Great: 435%
Hitachi HTS545032A7E380 320GB
35GB free
Firmware: JGBOA540
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 68 68 67 68 69 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 68.8
Write 35.3
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 67.7
38% 51.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 44%
USB 250GB
224GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 101 102 102 101 102 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.3% Average
Read 100
Write 86.6
Mixed 39
SusWrite 101
108% 81.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
70% 0.83 MB/s
USB 250GB
224GB free, PID 1576
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 92 94 93 94 92 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 91.4
Write 83.7
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 92.5
100% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 304%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL16G32C16U4W.M8FB1 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
75.1% Very good
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 22.3
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 21.6
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z390-P Builds (Compare 18,342 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z390-P - $106

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $700
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback