Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba PORTEGE Z30-A (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA PORTEGE Z30-A
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180426
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 27 '22 at 08:17
Run Duration	118 Seconds
Run User	PAK-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4010U-$280 12,162 User benchmarks, average bench 44% Socket BGA1168, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	25.8% Poor	Memory 34.1 1-Core 39.8 2-Core 72.6 29% 48.8 Pts	4-Core 100 8-Core 109 14% 105 Pts	64-Core 107 7% 107 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) 275,372 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Toshiba(1179 0005) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5070 Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	2.25% Terrible	Lighting 2.6 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 4.4 2% 2.9 fps	MRender 3.3 Gravity 1.9 Splatting 3.7 2% 2.97 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.25% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM871 mSATA 128GB 592 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 97GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT43D0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 146 146 146 145 147 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	53.9% Above average	Read 360 Write 152 Mixed 172 SusWrite 146 46% 208 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 36.8 4K Mixed 18.1 69% 24 MB/s	DQ Read 281 DQ Write 152 DQ Mixed 174 141% 202 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 81%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x8GB 168,538 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	15.4% Very poor	MC Read 5.6 MC Write 5.5 MC Mixed 4.4 15% 5.17 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 4.2 15% 5.2 GB/s	Latency 232 17% 232 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 67%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	278x

SSD
HG6 mSATA 128GBToshibaBench 71%, 3,217 samples	36x
HG6 mSATA 256GBToshibaBench 75%, 1,754 samples	32x
THNSNJ256GMCT 256GBToshibaBench 74%, 368 samples	30x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16