Performance Results


Gaming 30% Sail boat	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 25% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	43.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	61.7% Good	Memory 82 1-Core 68.7 2-Core 115 56% 88.7 Pts	4-Core 226 8-Core 334 35% 280 Pts	64-Core 345 21% 345 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Nvidia(10DE 1320) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.13 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43.1% Average	Lighting 56 Reflection 56.2 Parallax 48.3 46% 53.5 fps	MRender 41.8 Gravity 51.8 Splatting 45.8 38% 46.5 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-128M6S 2.5 128GB 3,907 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: DC7110D SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 273 275 295 247 268 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	63.9% Good	Read 272 Write 306 Mixed 249 SusWrite 269 62% 274 MB/s	4K Read 22.6 4K Write 38.9 4K Mixed 23.4 85% 28.3 MB/s	DQ Read 268 DQ Write 206 DQ Mixed 151 136% 208 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 95%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 213GB free Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 465 506 536 571 580 561 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	133% Outstanding	Read 1,013 Write 696 Mixed 485 SusWrite 537 152% 683 MB/s	4K Read 29.8 4K Write 67.3 4K Mixed 41.3 134% 46.1 MB/s	DQ Read 484 DQ Write 340 DQ Mixed 429 316% 418 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 133% Great: 254%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 463GB free Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 252 257 273 270 267 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	85.8% Excellent	Read 332 Write 246 Mixed 278 SusWrite 258 62% 278 MB/s	4K Read 33.4 4K Write 56.2 4K Mixed 40.9 133% 43.5 MB/s	DQ Read 391 DQ Write 297 DQ Mixed 418 292% 368 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 85.8% Great: 254%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173EB0- M378B5173DB0- M378B5173EB0- M378B5173EB0- 16GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 800, 800, 800, 800 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	47.7% Average	MC Read 19.6 MC Write 15 MC Mixed 17 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 8.6 SC Mixed 13.5 31% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 77 52% 77 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 46%, 10,715 samples	148x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 41%, 7,567 samples	68x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 39%, 4,786 samples	62x

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $366

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16