| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 26.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 33.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| System | NVIDIA 132-CK-NF79 |
| Motherboard | EVGA 132-CK-NF79 (all builds) |
| Memory | 9.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20091230 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 18 '17 at 10:03 |
| Run Duration | 189 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 1% |
PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz
|
55%
Above average
|
46% 68.4 Pts
|
22% 162 Pts
|
10% 162 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 280X-$500
CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.7.1
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.5%
Poor
|
23% 41.1 fps
|
33% 39.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
30.4%
Below average
|
20% 88.7 MB/s
|
60% 18.1 MB/s
|
32% 55.7 MB/s
|
|
|
33.1%
Below average
|
27% 122 MB/s
|
62% 23.2 MB/s
|
10% 21.8 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 12GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB
|
21.8%
Poor
|
18% 6.47 GB/s
|
20% 6.87 GB/s
|
53% 75.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 132-CK-NF79 Builds (Compare 44 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: EVGA 132-CK-NF79
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Extreme X9770IntelBench 57%, 522 samples | 13x |
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 7x |
| Core2 Quad Q9450Intel $110Bench 49%, 5,335 samples | 6x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 8x |
| GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 4x |
| GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $228 |