Lenovo F0AX00STTX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Lenovo F0AX00STTX (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO HASWELLREFRESHDT
Memory	2.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150915
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 16 '17 at 08:39
Run Duration	188 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4160-$79 48,506 User benchmarks, average bench 55% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	70.3% Very good	Memory 91.8 1-Core 107 2-Core 200 78% 133 Pts	4-Core 285 8-Core 285 38% 285 Pts	64-Core 285 18% 285 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz) 64,721 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 3696) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4264 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	3.37% Terrible	Lighting 3.53 Reflection 5.42 Parallax 4.44 3% 4.46 fps	MRender 4.86 Gravity 2.33 Splatting 7.7 4% 4.96 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.37% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 433GB free (System drive) Firmware: KC66 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 94 174717872 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 760 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 69 60 9235220 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 383 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 246 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 54 54 46 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 58 49 706478122 (C2) HDA temperature 42 51 94489280554 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 60 43 174717872 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 44641890075002 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3592893905 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3331038687	60% Good	Read 99.3 Write 110 Mixed 15.5 54% 75 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.08 4K Mixed 0.18 56% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 88%
USB3.0 FLASH DRIVE 64GB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 30GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	8.49% Terrible	Read 31.5 Write 2.74 Mixed 19 19% 17.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.67 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.62 62% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.49% Great: 31%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GB 50,921 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	32.4% Below average	MC Read 11 MC Write 10.6 MC Mixed 8.8 29% 10.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 11.1 SC Mixed 9.5 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 64.4 62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $250	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Lenovo F0AX00STTX

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)