Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 135%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics147% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive137% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateJul 16 '22 at 22:32
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$120
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Memory 90
1-Core 141
2-Core 282
94% 171 Pts
4-Core 549
8-Core 540
73% 544 Pts
64-Core 551
34% 551 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$484
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
147% Outstanding
Lighting 215
Reflection 196
Parallax 189
175% 200 fps
MRender 189
Gravity 154
Splatting 136
128% 160 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 147%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor PX-1TM9PeG 1TB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 473 456 337 289 275 214 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 126
Write 305
Mixed 52
SusWrite 341
47% 206 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 57.1
195% 72.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,443
DQ Write 830
DQ Mixed 827
698% 1,033 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 137%
Great: 270%
IRP_SSDPR_S25B_240 240GB
83GB free
Firmware: SAFM02.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 370 477 484 449 439 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 463
Mixed 358
SusWrite 426
98% 433 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 43.8
164% 61.9 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 196
189% 297 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 111%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
622GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 180 180 179 180 181 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 151
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 178
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 106%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$28
12GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 72 73 73 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 89
Write 88.8
Mixed 57.6
SusWrite 72.4
57% 76.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
79.2% Very good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 25.2
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 24.9
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 844 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 - $131

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $614
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback