Asrock P67 Pro3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	37.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock P67 Pro3 (all builds)
Memory	1.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131001
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jun 25 '22 at 17:47
Run Duration	310 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	20%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	48.6% Average	Memory 73 1-Core 43.9 2-Core 79.2 43% 65.4 Pts	4-Core 136 8-Core 180 20% 158 Pts	64-Core 202 12% 202 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% MSI(1462 341B) CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.3.1 Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	37.5% Below average	Lighting 44 Reflection 56.7 Parallax 64.8 36% 55.2 fps	MRender 57.3 Gravity 52.7 Splatting 42 41% 50.7 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD VelociRaptor 500GB-$62 8,133 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: 04.06A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 29 66 69 67 61 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	61.3% Good	Read 161 Write 161 Mixed 96 SusWrite 52.4 87% 118 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.3 244% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 113%
Seagate ST3250820AS 250GB-$60 16,391 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 17GB free Firmware: 3.AAD SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 67 70 70 68 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	38.9% Below average	Read 66.9 Write 34.3 Mixed 41.3 SusWrite 68.5 39% 52.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 44%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 60GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 135 135 131 133 137 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	65.2% Good	Read 92.7 Write 96.8 Mixed 68.8 SusWrite 134 72% 98.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 180% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 85%
Hitachi HCC545050A7E630 500GB 603 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 4GB free Firmware: GR2OA310 SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 24 40 42 38 36 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	23.7% Poor	Read 48.5 Write 51.1 Mixed 15.2 SusWrite 33.8 27% 37.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 103% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 23.7% Great: 60%
WD WD10JUCX-63WPNY0 1TB 494 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 81GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 47 69 69 68 62 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	35.5% Below average	Read 63.2 Write 58.7 Mixed 34.9 SusWrite 60.3 40% 54.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 154% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 64%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB 30,139 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 1GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 3.8 3.2 3.6 3.7 3.6 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	11.3% Very poor	Read 29.6 Write 11.5 Mixed 13.2 SusWrite 3.5 16% 14.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 2.5 158% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 13%
1,954 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 4GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 3.5 2.5 3.6 3.6 4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	2.41% Terrible	Read 8.7 Write 1.2 Mixed 1.8 SusWrite 3.3 4% 3.75 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 7% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.41% Great: 8%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 16GB 1,307 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID a815 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 6.2 6.1 6.3 6.2 6.2 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	5.23% Terrible	Read 20 Write 0.5 Mixed 4.7 SusWrite 5.8 8% 7.75 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.23% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend JM1600KLH-4G 04CD F3-12800CL9-2GBNQ 6GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	26% Poor	MC Read 8.7 MC Write 8.6 MC Mixed 7.8 24% 8.37 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 8.5 24% 8.4 GB/s	Latency 94.5 42% 94.5 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P67 Pro3 Builds (Compare 526 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Sail boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock P67 Pro3 - $94

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	213x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	45x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	43x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	46x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	34x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	32x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	20x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	19x
MX500 500GBCrucial $49Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	19x

RAM
CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 12GBUnknownBench 42%, 55 samples	18x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	13x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 53%, 47,852 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $620

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16