HP EliteBook Folio 9470m

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 80% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	HP EliteBook Folio 9470m (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 18DF
Memory	4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131008
Uptime	4.6 Days
Run Date	Jun 25 '22 at 09:41
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	PAK-User
Background CPU	5%
CPU Throttled	80%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3687U 2,933 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	51.1% Above average	Memory 77.9 1-Core 46.7 2-Core 88.9 47% 71.2 Pts	4-Core 144 8-Core 144 19% 144 Pts	64-Core 144 9% 144 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 18DF) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5059 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	3.04% Terrible	Lighting 3.8 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 2.8 3% 2.77 fps	MRender 3.5 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 4.5 3% 3.47 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.04% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteonit LMT-128M6M mSATA 128GB 1,674 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: DM7110F SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 250 276 285 291 299 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	55.9% Above average	Read 344 Write 277 Mixed 222 SusWrite 282 63% 281 MB/s	4K Read 9.1 4K Write 24.5 4K Mixed 10.5 40% 14.7 MB/s	DQ Read 302 DQ Write 271 DQ Mixed 203 175% 259 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 86%
Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ152 500GB 40,079 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 251GB free Firmware: 0002LIM1 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 134 Mixed 63.6 74% 98.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.8 139% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 77%
Generic Flash Disk 32GB 437 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 30GB free, PID 7777 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 3.6 3.6 3.8 3.4 3.6 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	2.77% Terrible	Read 11.4 Write 3.5 Mixed 1.7 SusWrite 3.3 5% 4.97 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 6% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.77% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 1x8GB 14,954 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	31.3% Below average	MC Read 11.1 MC Write 9.7 MC Mixed 9.3 29% 10 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 11.3 SC Mixed 10.3 31% 10.9 GB/s	Latency 84.6 47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteBook Folio 9470m Builds (Compare 953 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook Folio 9470m

CPU
Core i5-3437UIntelBench 49%, 3,817 samples	339x
Core i5-3427UIntelBench 49%, 4,182 samples	313x
Core i7-3687UIntelBench 53%, 2,933 samples	171x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	952x
Ivy 4PhdgdBench 4%, 153 samples	1x

SSD
SSD Pro 1500 Series 180GBIntel $209Bench 69%, 7,834 samples	65x
520 Series 180GBIntel $132Bench 72%, 14,258 samples	41x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	27x

RAM
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 13,765 samples	28x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	25x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 4% - Terrible

Total price: $209

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16