Toshiba TECRA C40-C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive34% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
24 months ago, 24 months ago.
SystemToshiba TECRA C40-C  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA TECRA C40-C
Memory9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171026
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '22 at 17:04
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6006U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
44.3% Average
Memory 67
1-Core 54
2-Core 85.3
44% 68.8 Pts
4-Core 127
8-Core 133
17% 130 Pts
64-Core 152
9% 152 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Toshiba(1179 001E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9416
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 5.7
4% 4.47 fps
Gravity 5.1
Splatting 0.2
2% 2.65 fps
Poor: 3% Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 600ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 66 72 68 69 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
34% Below average
Read 132
Write 115
Mixed 137
SusWrite 67.8
25% 113 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 39.8
4K Mixed 18.6
65% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 81.3
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 87.8
69% 94.9 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 1315 CT102464BF160B.C16 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.8% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 9.3
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 9.6
28% 9.83 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback