Gigabyte GA-H77M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H77M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130731
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateApr 20 '22 at 11:01
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 87.2
1-Core 103
2-Core 190
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 508
52% 422 Pts
64-Core 504
31% 504 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Gainward(10B0 1187) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1550 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Lighting 31.5
Reflection 33.4
Parallax 40.6
26% 35.2 fps
MRender 43.4
Gravity 41.1
Splatting 34.1
32% 39.5 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$90
654GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 102 113 113 115 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 363
Write 344
Mixed 297
SusWrite 110
62% 279 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 64.5
4K Mixed 32.7
115% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 32.8
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 44.2
42% 62.7 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 137%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
54GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 113 114 113 115 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 70.5
Write 71.6
Mixed 52.9
SusWrite 114
57% 77.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
192% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 109%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
262GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 101 101 101 101 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 114
Write 115
Mixed 37
SusWrite 100
66% 91.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 108%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
55GB free
Firmware: 0710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 64 64 65 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Read 48
Write 68.4
Mixed 76
SusWrite 64.4
48% 64.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.8
191% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 66%
Asmedia ASMT1153e 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 32.7
Write 26.4
Mixed 23.9
SusWrite 18.9
19% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
114% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 99%
SanDisk SD SDDR-289 128GB
119GB free, PID b6ba
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 32
Write 25.4
Mixed 25.7
SusWrite 16.6
32% 24.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 2.7
184% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD38G16002 8502 PSD38G16002 04CB 04CB 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.7% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 15.3
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 16.6
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H77M-D3H Builds (Compare 1,272 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H77M-D3H - $99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $424
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback