Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2310-$90 15,623 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	71.4% Very good	Memory 89.4 1-Core 82 2-Core 161 67% 111 Pts	4-Core 311 8-Core 310 42% 310 Pts	64-Core 307 19% 307 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.48% Terrible	Lighting 4.2 Reflection 4 Parallax 4.3 3% 4.17 fps	MRender 3.9 Gravity 4 Splatting 5 4% 4.3 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.48% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$62 60,851 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 366GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 230 218 232 233 238 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	72% Very good	Read 253 Write 242 Mixed 242 SusWrite 229 54% 241 MB/s	4K Read 32.9 4K Write 48.7 4K Mixed 38.3 125% 40 MB/s	DQ Read 205 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 198 149% 198 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 130%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99P5471-011.A00LF 99P5471-004.A01LF 8GB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	52.5% Above average	MC Read 18.5 MC Write 19.3 MC Mixed 16.8 52% 18.2 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 16.6 43% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 68 59% 68 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	162x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	37x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	33x

RAM
M378B5273CH0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 29%, 2,147 samples	17x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	13x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 29%, 7,230 samples	12x

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $193

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16