Asus Z97M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics62.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z97M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160222
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMar 18 '22 at 01:04
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
68% Good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 94.2
2-Core 140
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 384
44% 346 Pts
64-Core 393
24% 393 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 68%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$230
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
62.1% Good
Lighting 82.2
Reflection 70.5
Parallax 73.5
67% 75.4 fps
MRender 71
Gravity 65.2
Splatting 58.6
52% 64.9 fps
Poor: 69%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 530 Series 240GB-$149
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC32
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 364
Write 209
Mixed 220
58% 264 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 59.1
4K Mixed 24.2
99% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 25.1
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 35.6
37% 56.6 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 91%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
247GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 347 346 340 290 298 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 392
Write 393
Mixed 389
SusWrite 326
85% 375 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 72.5
4K Mixed 40.5
135% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 44.9
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 60.5
54% 77.5 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 133%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 4TB-$230
36GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 129 134 127 122 135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 148
Write 141
Mixed 64.4
SusWrite 130
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.8
338% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 94%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
683GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 135 134 136 127 135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 139
Write 128
Mixed 109
SusWrite 133
94% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM2L16BC8R2-B06S 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1632 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
41.8% Average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 13.1
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 13.3
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,032 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97M-PLUS - $350

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $998
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback