Asus P5B-PLUS Series

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	35.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P5B-PLUS Series (all builds)
Memory	2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090310
Uptime	13.5 Days
Run Date	Mar 10 '22 at 22:14
Run Duration	206 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650-$170 16,719 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	54% Above average	Memory 77.2 1-Core 47.3 2-Core 94.2 47% 72.9 Pts	4-Core 181 8-Core 182 24% 182 Pts	64-Core 156 10% 156 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Gigabyte(1458 3603) 2GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	35.9% Below average	Lighting 41.8 Reflection 38.6 Parallax 54.2 34% 44.9 fps	MRender 55.2 Gravity 51.7 Splatting 41.3 40% 49.4 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$109 80,665 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 687GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 83 93 88 100 102 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	47% Average	Read 201 Write 218 Mixed 161 SusWrite 89.3 38% 167 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 46.8 4K Mixed 30 99% 33.5 MB/s	DQ Read 35 DQ Write 80.1 DQ Mixed 47.9 39% 54.3 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 128%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$50 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 139GB free Firmware: UF220400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 144 121 112 119 117 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.5% Below average	Read 221 Write 200 Mixed 174 SusWrite 126 40% 180 MB/s	4K Read 16 4K Write 9.4 4K Mixed 15.3 49% 13.6 MB/s	DQ Read 17.6 DQ Write 12 DQ Mixed 17 12% 15.5 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 55%
Seagate ST3400620NS 400GB-$179 751 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 17GB free Firmware: 3.AEG SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 57 57 56 54 57 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	30.9% Below average	Read 51.8 Write 46.6 Mixed 38 SusWrite 55.5 35% 48 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 42%
Hitachi HUA722010CLA330 1TB-$38 10,195 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 135GB free Firmware: JP4OA3EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 93 91 87 90 90 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	52.4% Above average	Read 93.2 Write 97.2 Mixed 50 SusWrite 89.4 60% 82.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 76%
Amd-raid WDC WD20EZBX-75A 2TB 962 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 590GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 86 94 95 100 102 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	76.6% Very good	Read 171 Write 126 Mixed 47.7 SusWrite 92.8 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 12.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.9 644% 4.83 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 135%
Generic- USB3.0 CRW -1 32GB 58 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 30GB free, PID 4000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 7.6 10 9.7 11 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	6.25% Terrible	Read 14 Write 5.5 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 9.6 10% 8.58 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.5 45% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.25% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM SDRAM Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	15.6% Very poor	MC Read 4 MC Write 5.2 MC Mixed 3.8 12% 4.33 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 5.6 SC Mixed 4.5 14% 4.9 GB/s	Latency 85.9 46% 85.9 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5B-PLUS Series Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5B-PLUS Series

CPU
Core2 Extreme X9650Intel $850Bench 53%, 3,122 samples	2x
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples	2x
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	2x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	2x
Radeon HD 5670AMDBench 6%, 18,196 samples	2x

SSD
CS1311 240GBPNY $78Bench 81%, 26,547 samples	2x
MX500 250GBCrucial $39Bench 101%, 77,177 samples	2x
840 Pro 128GBSamsung $150Bench 90%, 34,842 samples	1x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	10x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	2x
3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 45,030 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 37% - Below average

Total price: $1,020

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16