Monster ABRA A7 V12.4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics1.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive284% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMonster ABRA A7 V12.4  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A7 V12.4
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201005
Uptime17.1 Days
Run DateMar 01 '22 at 19:51
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10200H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
81% Excellent
Memory 94.6
1-Core 120
2-Core 208
82% 141 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 670
62% 517 Pts
64-Core 672
42% 672 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 81%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 8535) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9365
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
1.61% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 63.9
Parallax 3.9
2% 23.6 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.61%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-00000 512GB
336GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 848 758 795 793 787 789 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
284% Outstanding
Read 2,556
Write 2,294
Mixed 1,745
SusWrite 795
413% 1,848 MB/s
4K Read 62.4
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 84.3
276% 95.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,236
DQ Write 873
DQ Mixed 1,030
776% 1,046 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 284%
Great: 316%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
887GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 176 176 178 178 175 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 53.9
Write 146
Mixed 80.9
SusWrite 170
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
187% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
MC Read 35.2
MC Write 36.3
MC Mixed 25
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 39.7
SC Mixed 27.7
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 58.2
69% 58.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A7 V12.4 Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A7 V12.4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $55
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback