Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics74.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive277% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '22 at 13:28
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Memory 76.9
1-Core 136
2-Core 271
87% 161 Pts
4-Core 528
8-Core 774
81% 651 Pts
64-Core 786
49% 786 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$240
Device(7377 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Lighting 92.4
Reflection 91.9
Parallax 85.5
75% 89.9 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 81.5
Splatting 73.8
72% 90.1 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$66
420GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2002 2000 2038 691 287 296 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
277% Outstanding
Read 1,650
Write 2,069
Mixed 1,708
SusWrite 1,219
375% 1,662 MB/s
4K Read 61.1
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 85
290% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,156
DQ Write 954
DQ Mixed 1,029
778% 1,046 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 277%
Great: 295%
Klevv NEO N400 SSD 240GB
223GB free
Firmware: SBFME1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 131 130 130 129 132 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 419
Write 362
Mixed 280
SusWrite 162
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 91.7
4K Mixed 31.6
132% 50.7 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 162
150% 228 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 93%
USB 2.0 Flash Drive 64GB
51GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 9.1 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
7.8% Terrible
Read 27.9
Write 7.7
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 10.3
18% 15.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
24% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.8%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2G43MX3-CTD 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
50% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 16.6
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 16.2
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 86.6
46% 86.6 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 50%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 5,993 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $358
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback