MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51)

Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	74.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B51
Motherboard	MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51) (all builds)
Memory	8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190808
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 21 '22 at 08:21
Run Duration	443 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	17%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$96 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	64.6% Good	Memory 63.9 1-Core 118 2-Core 137 64% 106 Pts	4-Core 351 8-Core 566 56% 459 Pts	64-Core 670 42% 670 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3701) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.23 Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	74.6% Very good	Lighting 92.9 Reflection 97.3 Parallax 88.1 76% 92.8 fps	MRender 82.4 Gravity 92.8 Splatting 89 72% 88.1 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 54GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2089 Write 1,809 Mixed 1,506 401% 1,801 MB/s	4K Read 44.7 4K Write 84.1 4K Mixed 58.1 187% 62.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,122 DQ Write 762 DQ Mixed 888 677% 924 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 47GB free Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 207 205 207 200 218 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	90.2% Outstanding	Read 448 Write 421 Mixed 312 SusWrite 232 79% 353 MB/s	4K Read 34.4 4K Write 72.6 4K Mixed 44.1 147% 50.4 MB/s	DQ Read 257 DQ Write 296 DQ Mixed 309 224% 287 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 90.2% Great: 114%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB 13,039 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 727GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 29 30 26 26 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	6.91% Terrible	Read 30.1 Write 31.9 Mixed 31.9 SusWrite 28 7% 30.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 4 13% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 6.91% Great: 99%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$144 41,734 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 825GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 143 143 142 138 138 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	41.6% Average	Read 333 Write 153 Mixed 139 SusWrite 141 42% 191 MB/s	4K Read 9.3 4K Write 27.9 4K Mixed 12 44% 16.4 MB/s	DQ Read 119 DQ Write 152 DQ Mixed 75.4 74% 116 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 128%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$144 41,734 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 208GB free Firmware: SVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 169 153 152 156 154 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	90.7% Outstanding	Read 442 Write 349 Mixed 386 SusWrite 203 77% 345 MB/s	4K Read 31.7 4K Write 73.8 4K Mixed 44.4 144% 50 MB/s	DQ Read 360 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 334 255% 344 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 90.7% Great: 128%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 184GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 100 101 103 99 102 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	55% Above average	Read 89.9 Write 67.8 Mixed 42.9 SusWrite 101 55% 75.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 152% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 79%
WD WD60EZAZ-00ZGHB0 6TB 1,497 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 60GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 118 121 118 121 119 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	66.5% Good	Read 109 Write 120 Mixed 92.5 SusWrite 119 82% 110 MB/s	4K Read 4.8 4K Write 8 4K Mixed 0.7 426% 4.5 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 101%
WD WD60EZAZ-00ZGHB0 6TB 1,497 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 23GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 171 175 172 172 176 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	95.3% Outstanding	Read 156 Write 153 Mixed 89.9 SusWrite 173 105% 143 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 7.5 4K Mixed 0.8 370% 3.9 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 95.3% Great: 101%
WD WD60EZAZ-00ZGHB0 6TB 1,497 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 8GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 151 133 107 127 147 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 101%
TOSHIBA HDWR160 6TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 48GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 31 32 32 32 32 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	29.7% Poor	Read 118 Write 110 Mixed 52.1 SusWrite 31.3 98% 78.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 33%
WDC WD60 EZAZ-00ZGHB0 6TB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 120 Write 104 Mixed 42 105% 88.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 0.4 202% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 65%
TOSHIBA HDWR160 6TB 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 31 32 32 32 33 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	15.1% Very poor	Read 26.7 Write 76.3 Mixed 40.5 SusWrite 31.6 64% 43.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 66% 0.73 MB/s

TOSHIBA MD04ACA400 4TB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 3.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 63 64 63 63 63 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	34.7% Below average	Read 89.8 Write 81.6 Mixed 50.2 SusWrite 63 93% 71.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.2 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 128% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$30 287,720 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	53.5% Above average	MC Read 21.4 MC Write 19.7 MC Mixed 17.4 56% 19.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 16 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51) Builds (Compare 22,819 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 91%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 84%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51) - $200

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $265Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	5,592x
Core i5-9600KIntel $137Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	5,267x
Core i9-9900KIntel $405Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	2,960x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $296Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	1,629x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,545x
RTX 3070Nvidia $490Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	1,326x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	903x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	765x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $79Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	702x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	1,082x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	993x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	695x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $901

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16