Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 41% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	49.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	198% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190116
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 15 '22 at 22:05
Run Duration	347 Seconds
Run User	SVK-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185 123,820 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	74.1% Very good	Memory 73.2 1-Core 106 2-Core 212 72% 130 Pts	4-Core 403 8-Core 655 65% 529 Pts	64-Core 1,039 64% 1,039 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325 82,117 User benchmarks, average bench 50% Gigabyte(1458 22BD) ≥ 4GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1046.0 Performing below potential (68^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	49.8% Average	Lighting 64.8 Reflection 73.2 Parallax 85.4 53% 74.5 fps	MRender 61.8 Gravity 59.4 Splatting 44.3 44% 55.2 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$73 171,271 User benchmarks, average bench 212% 488GB free (System drive) Firmware: P3CR021 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1250 1169 1147 1352 1360 127 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	198% Outstanding	Read 1,601 Write 1,464 Mixed 1,184 SusWrite 1,068 298% 1,329 MB/s	4K Read 54.1 4K Write 54.7 4K Mixed 52.8 179% 53.9 MB/s	DQ Read 347 DQ Write 234 DQ Mixed 275 210% 286 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 198% Great: 295%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 101GB free Firmware: SBFKB1C3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 44 61 19 36 61 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	19.7% Very poor	Read 89.4 Write 89.6 Mixed 74.2 SusWrite 65.8 18% 79.8 MB/s	4K Read 9.5 4K Write 17.6 4K Mixed 10.4 37% 12.5 MB/s	DQ Read 12.4 DQ Write 15.4 DQ Mixed 13.3 10% 13.7 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 19.7% Great: 102%
WD WD80EDAZ-11TA3A0 8TB 623 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 6.5TB free Firmware: 81.00A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 190 189 189 188 189 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 114%
WD WD5000AACS-00ZUB0 500GB 19,716 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 362GB free Firmware: 01.01B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 71 71 71 71 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	41.1% Average	Read 73.2 Write 57.8 Mixed 53.6 SusWrite 69.6 47% 63.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.8 158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 49%
Hitachi HDS721010KLA330 1TB-$47 10,943 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 67GB free Firmware: GKAOA70M SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 45 47 46 47 46 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	33.1% Below average	Read 68.3 Write 71.6 Mixed 38.2 SusWrite 46.6 41% 56.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1 180% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 46%
WD WD5000AUDX-63WNHY0 500GB 3,993 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 99GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 85 87 87 88 87 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	48.9% Average	Read 82.6 Write 89.8 Mixed 61.9 SusWrite 87.3 59% 80.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.7 141% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 73%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159 43,620 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 26GB free Firmware: GM4OA52A SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 53 55 53 55 54 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	28.1% Poor	Read 43.6 Write 49.4 Mixed 23.1 SusWrite 54 31% 42.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 51%
Hitachi HDS725050KLA360 500GB-$40 5,497 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 57GB free Firmware: K2AOA60A SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 56 59 58 58 56 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	28.8% Poor	Read 42.6 Write 45.7 Mixed 33.2 SusWrite 57.3 33% 44.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 34%
Toshiba StorE HDD 2TB 266 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 257GB free, PID 0b16 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 33 33 34 33 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	17.7% Very poor	Read 29 Write 32.8 Mixed 30.2 SusWrite 33.2 44% 31.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 17.7% Great: 26%
SYMWAVE HUA721010KLA330 1TB 0GB free, PID 18ae Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 35.2 Write 34.2 Mixed 25.7 40% 31.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 84% 1.03 MB/s

WDC WD50 WD-WCASU708 500GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 278GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	11.5% Very poor	Read 26.7 Write 26.9 Mixed 23.1 SusWrite 1.8 25% 19.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.7 104% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 18%
WDC WD32 WD-WCAYU093 320GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 294GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 13 14 14 14 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	13.6% Very poor	Read 32.2 Write 26.5 Mixed 26 SusWrite 13.6 32% 24.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 14%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB 12,029 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 4TB free, PID 25ee Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 146 143 149 138 149 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	59.6% Above average	Read 149 Write 150 Mixed 81.8 SusWrite 146 177% 132 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1.4 116% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 98%
WD Elements 25A1 2TB 7,574 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 460GB free, PID 25a1 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 33 33 34 33 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	25.6% Poor	Read 35.8 Write 34.2 Mixed 26.6 SusWrite 33.2 44% 32.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0.4 161% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 58%
Seagate FreeAgent XTreme 2TB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 84GB free, PID 3101 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 38 38 38 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	20% Very poor	Read 36.2 Write 31.9 Mixed 27.5 SusWrite 37.2 45% 33.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 20%
WD My Book 1TB 10,299 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 877GB free, PID 1100 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 23 23 23 23 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	17.9% Very poor	Read 35.6 Write 34.6 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 22.7 40% 30.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.7 111% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3600 C17 Series 4x8GB 1,452 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	74.8% Very good	MC Read 28 MC Write 26.2 MC Mixed 25.1 76% 26.4 GB/s	SC Read 22.1 SC Write 28.5 SC Mixed 25.1 72% 25.2 GB/s	Latency 94.3 42% 94.3 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 125%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	100x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	88x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	75x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	70x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	49x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $1,066

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)