HP 850-065se

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.88% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	57.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP 850-065se (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 2B3A
Memory	25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150511
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 06 '22 at 18:37
Run Duration	358 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	76.1% Very good	Memory 83.8 1-Core 91.3 2-Core 194 71% 123 Pts	4-Core 369 8-Core 586 59% 477 Pts	64-Core 775 48% 775 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 745 (OEM)-$60 26,874 User benchmarks, average bench 10% HP(103C 6893) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.07 Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	7.88% Terrible	Lighting 8.8 Reflection 12.1 Parallax 9.6 7% 10.2 fps	MRender 9.7 Gravity 11.4 Splatting 12.3 9% 11.1 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 7.88% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 460GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 797 674 674 675 673 675 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	204% Outstanding	Read 1,999 Write 1,851 Mixed 1,373 SusWrite 695 331% 1,479 MB/s	4K Read 46 4K Write 89.6 4K Mixed 61.6 196% 65.7 MB/s	DQ Read 577 DQ Write 320 DQ Mixed 458 338% 452 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 204% Great: 340%
Samsung MZ7TE256HMHP-000H1 256GB 1,925 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT09H0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 82 69 58 68 63 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	57.8% Above average	Read 424 Write 66 Mixed 116 SusWrite 70.5 37% 169 MB/s	4K Read 22.4 4K Write 45.9 4K Mixed 22.2 87% 30.2 MB/s	DQ Read 368 DQ Write 87.7 DQ Mixed 78.7 96% 178 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1TB free Firmware: HP51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 191 192 192 192 192 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 175 Write 126 Mixed 81.3 SusWrite 190 105% 143 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 114%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 535GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 107 108 107 106 105 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	61.3% Good	Read 107 Write 99.8 Mixed 60.3 SusWrite 106 68% 93.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 62%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71 17,356 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0106 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 115 109 114 115 114 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	63.4% Good	Read 108 Write 106 Mixed 55.7 SusWrite 113 70% 95.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2TB free Firmware: 0106 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 142 157 155 154 138 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	78.1% Very good	Read 126 Write 116 Mixed 85.8 SusWrite 146 87% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 114%
Hitachi HDP725050GLA360 500GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 465GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 78 78 79 79 78 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	36.4% Below average	Read 88 Write 85 Mixed 48.9 SusWrite 78.1 100% 75 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 37%
WDC WD50 00AAKS-00YGA0 500GB 456GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 76 75 75 75 74 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	34.7% Below average	Read 75.2 Write 73.8 Mixed 53.7 SusWrite 74.4 94% 69.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 115% 1.33 MB/s

WDC WD10 EURX-63FH1Y0 1TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 931GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 116 115 117 117 117 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	56.3% Above average	Read 157 Write 150 Mixed 113 SusWrite 117 178% 134 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 126% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 56%
WDC WD10 EURX-63FH1Y0 1TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 645GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.3 0 0.2 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	18.9% Very poor	Read 92.2 Write 93.2 Mixed 85.3 SusWrite 0.2 87% 67.7 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 92% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 18.9% Great: 56%
WDC WD10 PURX-64E5EY0 1TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 931GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 151 149 150 151 151 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	63.6% Good	Read 156 Write 145 Mixed 85.4 SusWrite 150 179% 134 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 126% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 64%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 2TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 117 115 118 117 118 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	47.8% Average	Read 114 Write 112 Mixed 76.6 SusWrite 117 142% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 40%
Hitachi HDP725050GLA360 500GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 466GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 80 80 80 80 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	36.3% Below average	Read 88.2 Write 83.5 Mixed 49.4 SusWrite 80 100% 75.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 98% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB M378A1G43DB0-CPB Kingston KHX2133C14D4/8G Kingston KHX2133C14D4/8G 32GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	102% Outstanding	MC Read 39 MC Write 41.8 MC Mixed 38.7 114% 39.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 18.7 SC Mixed 21.1 52% 18.1 GB/s	Latency 73.7 54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 102%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 850-065se Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 15%

Tree trunk

System: HP 850-065se

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	12x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	2x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 745 (OEM)Nvidia $60Bench 10%, 26,874 samples	3x
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	3x
R9 270AMD $140Bench 24%, 47,409 samples	1x

SSD
MZ7TE256HMHP-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 68%, 1,925 samples	2x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	1x
BX100 120GBCrucial $70Bench 76%, 6,931 samples	1x

RAM
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 4x8GBHynixBench 83%, 2,656 samples	3x
M378A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 8,407 samples	2x
M378A1G43DB0-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 6,175 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $190

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16