| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 33.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 93.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock Z87M Extreme4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160412 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 21 '21 at 11:28 |
| Run Duration | 178 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
77.1%
Very good
|
70% 124 Pts
|
54% 408 Pts
|
25% 406 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Gainward(10B0 1184) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
33.7%
Below average
|
32% 42.1 fps
|
37% 46.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 140 142 140 140 141 MB/s
|
93.3%
Outstanding
|
75% 336 MB/s
|
158% 56.6 MB/s
|
183% 300 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
2TB free
Firmware: CC29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 188 189 190 191 189 MB/s
|
105%
Outstanding
|
102% 140 MB/s
|
162% 1.13 MB/s
| |
|
Intenso Ultra Line 16GB
10GB free, PID 0917
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 22 24 24 24 24 MB/s
|
24.8%
Poor
|
44% 43.6 MB/s
|
54% 2.97 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
54%
Above average
|
53% 18.4 GB/s
|
50% 17.6 GB/s
|
56% 72.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Z87M Extreme4 Builds (Compare 239 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock Z87M Extreme4 - $200
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples | 56x |
| Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples | 41x |
| Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples | 39x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 21x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 20x |
| GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 19x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 65% - Good | Total price: $415 |