HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3397
Memory	5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Χρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121012
Uptime	9.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 06 '21 at 17:20
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	75.9% Very good	Memory 83.7 1-Core 104 2-Core 206 75% 131 Pts	4-Core 371 8-Core 511 56% 441 Pts	64-Core 512 32% 512 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15 52,547 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 3397) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.4% Terrible	Lighting 4.1 Reflection 1.9 Parallax 2.8 3% 2.93 fps	MRender 5.3 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 5 4% 4.23 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.4% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSD Pro 1500 Series 180GB-$209 7,834 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 119GB free (System drive) Firmware: LH6i SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 157 157 159 162 164 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	62.6% Good	Read 315 Write 185 Mixed 237 SusWrite 162 50% 225 MB/s	4K Read 25.8 4K Write 48.4 4K Mixed 27.6 100% 33.9 MB/s	DQ Read 268 DQ Write 150 DQ Mixed 140 122% 186 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 82%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 223GB free Firmware: S1Z40102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 241 242 236 239 239 MB/s Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	63.8% Good	Read 254 Write 235 Mixed 232 SusWrite 240 54% 240 MB/s	4K Read 27.8 4K Write 47.7 4K Mixed 24.9 99% 33.5 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 194 DQ Mixed 48.5 78% 149 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 100%
ADATA SV620 240GB 78 User benchmarks, average bench 154% 127GB free, PID a65a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	35.3% Below average	Read 28.7 Write 21.4 Mixed 24.1 SusWrite 26.1 34% 25.1 MB/s	4K Read 7.7 4K Write 7.7 4K Mixed 7.8 556% 7.73 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 259%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 2x4GB 14,844 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	52.2% Above average	MC Read 20.9 MC Write 18.8 MC Mixed 16 53% 18.6 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 11.4 38% 13.2 GB/s	Latency 74 54% 74 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 SFF Builds (Compare 5,412 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	2,466x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	1,466x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	797x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	1,922x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	726x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	489x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	266x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	83x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	78x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	64x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	57x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	52x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16