PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 14.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 38% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P5KPL-AM SE (all builds) |
Memory | 0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | Χρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20081030 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Dec 02 '21 at 16:23 |
Run Duration | 681 Seconds |
Run User | GRC-User |
Background CPU | 75% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
|
42.9%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 550-$79
Sapphire(1DA2 E367) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.11.3
|
14.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 72 74 84 65 46 MB/s
|
38%
Below average
|
|||
22%
Poor
|
||||
Adata Premier Pro SP900 128GB-$40
54GB free
Firmware: 5.0.7b
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 95 86 94 79 71 MB/s
|
32%
Below average
|
|||
WD WD2500KS-00MJB0 250GB-$78
229GB free
Firmware: 02.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 28 28 27 MB/s
|
24.9%
Poor
|
|||
Maxtor 6 Y080M0 82GB
55GB free
Firmware: YAR5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
|
15.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Maxtor 6 V250F0 251GB
234GB free
Firmware: VA11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 26 27 27 27 27 MB/s
|
28%
Poor
|
|||
SanDisk SDSSDP128G 128GB
87GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 18 13 13 14 MB/s
|
13.2%
Very poor
|
|||
ASMT 2115 500GB
45GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 48 51 53 52 52 MB/s
|
25.8%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
|
16%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Pentium E5300Intel $59Bench 36%, 18,604 samples | 34x |
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 32x |
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples | 30x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 41x |
GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples | 34x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 20x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 44% - Average | Total price: $87 |