One-netbook ONE XPLAYER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive148% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemOne-netbook ONE XPLAYER  (all builds)
MotherboardONE-NETBOOK ONE XPLAYER
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1600 x 2560 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210715
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 14 '21 at 21:37
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Memory 71.8
1-Core 168
2-Core 304
97% 181 Pts
4-Core 504
8-Core 656
74% 580 Pts
64-Core 663
41% 663 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1069
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 25.2
Reflection 28.3
Parallax 28.4
20% 27.3 fps
Splatting 0.2
0% 0.2 fps
Poor: 8% Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
One-netbook PCI-E 01TB SSD
607GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFMB0.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1710 365 341 345 349 346 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
148% Outstanding
Read 1,207
Write 1,865
Mixed 1,096
SusWrite 576
268% 1,186 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 98.5
4K Mixed 36.3
166% 59.8 MB/s
DQ Read 571
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 174
169% 282 MB/s
Poor: 148%
This bench: 148%
Great: 287%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB
2TB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 117 118 117 117 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
48% Average
Read 110
Write 110
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 117
127% 95.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 48%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
126% Outstanding
MC Read 41
MC Write 61.3
MC Mixed 43.8
139% 48.7 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 48
SC Mixed 19.2
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 97.2
41% 97.2 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 126%
Great: 154%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ONE XPLAYER Builds (Compare 113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: One-netbook ONE XPLAYER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback