Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS_BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics0.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS_BR  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateOct 19 '21 at 00:01
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 78.2
1-Core 147
2-Core 283
92% 170 Pts
4-Core 529
8-Core 830
84% 680 Pts
64-Core 1,042
64% 1,042 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6800 GS
Nvidia(10DE 0339) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 309.08
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.38% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 0.3
Parallax 0.1
1% 0.37 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.38%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG SPECTRIX S40G 256GB
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VB411D55
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 318 357 374 201 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 809
Write 392
Mixed 364
SusWrite 277
102% 460 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 45.3
4K Mixed 24.9
83% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 265
194% 252 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 86%
Great: 273%
Maxtor 6V250F0 251GB
187GB free
Firmware: VA111630
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 55 63 63 63 63 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 62
Write 68.1
Mixed 40.3
SusWrite 61.5
43% 58 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 0.1
153% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 36%
Great: 39%
Samsung HD161HJ 41R0186LEN 160GB
38GB free
Firmware: JF100-19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 44 47 46 46 46 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Read 56
Write 57.3
Mixed 34
SusWrite 46.2
36% 48.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
97% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 42%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
46GB free
Firmware: 1AC01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 66 74 71 75 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
36% Below average
Read 52.4
Write 41.9
Mixed 50.1
SusWrite 72.5
40% 54.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36%
Great: 62%
Maxtor STM3250310AS 250GB
83GB free
Firmware: 3.AAC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 78 89 91 92 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 81
Write 45
Mixed 46
SusWrite 88.5
48% 65.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 53%
Seagate ST3200827AS 200GB-$128
186GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 57 65 64 66 64 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 54.4
Write 30.1
Mixed 39.9
SusWrite 63
35% 46.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Silicon-Power SP016GXLZU320BSA 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
53.6% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 18.2
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 18.8
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 84
48% 84 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS_BR Builds (Compare 823 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS_BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $529
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback