To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200113
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 09 '21 at 17:36
Run Duration	247 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8300-$168 49,767 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	37.4% Below average	Memory 59.2 1-Core 23.9 2-Core 44.1 30% 42.4 Pts	4-Core 86.1 8-Core 150 14% 118 Pts	64-Core 153 10% 153 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 220 1,709 User benchmarks, average bench 1% PwrHis(1787 5220) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.06% Terrible	Lighting 1.2 Reflection 2 Parallax 1.6 1% 1.6 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.9 1% 1.43 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.06% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 195GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF2204RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 114 143 134 116 110 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33% Below average	Read 231 Write 204 Mixed 169 SusWrite 131 41% 184 MB/s	4K Read 14.5 4K Write 21.1 4K Mixed 6.6 42% 14.1 MB/s	DQ Read 115 DQ Write 49.7 DQ Mixed 27.4 35% 64.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1866C10D3/8G 16GB 2,172 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 0 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	30.7% Below average	MC Read 11.9 MC Write 9.6 MC Mixed 12.3 32% 11.3 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 8.5 18% 6.43 GB/s	Latency 130 31% 130 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 4: 0R 1G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
4%	5%	44	7	5	60	21.5"	1920 1080	SAM0C2D S22E310

History: Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 4: 0R 1G 1B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,573 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	712x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	278x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	264x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	616x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	461x
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	361x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	137x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	103x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	90x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	500x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	300x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	227x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16