Asus M70AD

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	10.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	67.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus M70AD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M70AD
Memory	3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140620
Uptime	17.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 06 '21 at 12:49
Run Duration	183 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$135 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	83.1% Excellent	Memory 92.6 1-Core 115 2-Core 192 79% 133 Pts	4-Core 398 8-Core 599 62% 498 Pts	64-Core 575 36% 575 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 745 (OEM)-$60 26,874 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 862C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	10.7% Very poor	Lighting 13.3 Reflection 15.1 Parallax 10.7 11% 13 fps	MRender 10.6 Gravity 13.1 Splatting 14 10% 12.6 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 107GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 222 211 206 207 210 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	67.6% Good	Read 228 Write 226 Mixed 203 SusWrite 215 49% 218 MB/s	4K Read 26.6 4K Write 78.8 4K Mixed 30.3 121% 45.2 MB/s	DQ Read 199 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 172 134% 185 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 129%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 141GB free Firmware: ABS0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 182 173 184 184 184 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	88.7% Excellent	Read 128 Write 112 Mixed 31.8 SusWrite 181 82% 113 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 140% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 88.7% Great: 108%
WD My Book 1130 1TB 1,203 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 104GB free, PID 1130 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 51 51 51 51 51 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	25.9% Poor	Read 67.1 Write 53.3 Mixed 48.8 SusWrite 50.8 73% 55 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 41%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 13,169 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 10GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 2.8 2.4 2.7 2.2 2.4 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	4.18% Terrible	Read 18.9 Write 2.7 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 2.5 7% 7.07 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.18% Great: 8%
Samsung Type-C 128GB 426 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 23GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 29 28 27 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	13% Very poor	Read 39 Write 24.6 Mixed 0.2 SusWrite 26.5 27% 22.6 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.4 36% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 2x4GB 14,844 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 20.2 MC Mixed 16.7 55% 19.4 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 20.8 SC Mixed 17.6 52% 18.1 GB/s	Latency 63 64% 63 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	20.1"	1280 720	SAM03F0 SyncMaster

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M70AD Builds (Compare 94 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus M70AD

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	36x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	23x
Core i3-4170Intel $59Bench 57%, 48,178 samples	10x

GPU
GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples	20x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	11x
GTX 745 (OEM)Nvidia $60Bench 10%, 26,874 samples	10x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	7x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	4x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	4x

RAM
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 30%, 12,268 samples	16x
SLB304G08-GGNHM 2x8GBUnknownBench 55%, 513 samples	7x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBKingstonBench 52%, 19,522 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $127

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16