PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 56.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 92.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Asus Z10PA-D8 Series (all builds) |
Motherboard | ASUSTeK Z10PA-D8 Series |
Memory | 10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | Цвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190823 |
Uptime | 1.3 Days |
Run Date | Sep 30 '21 at 17:21 |
Run Duration | 173 Seconds |
Run User | UKR-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
|
74.8%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1900 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.68
|
56.8%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kioxia-exceria SATA SSD 240GB
22GB free
Firmware: SBFA17.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 109 87 87 80 64 MB/s
|
78%
Very good
|
|||
Transcend TS512GMTS430S 512GB
264GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02J0TBD1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 275 218 221 220 219 MB/s
|
92.6%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 750GB-$55
253GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 93 98 93 97 97 MB/s
|
39.9%
Below average
|
|||
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
762GB free
Firmware: 50.0AB50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 110 111 111 112 112 MB/s
|
63.4%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix HMA41GR7AFR4N-TF 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
36.9%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 12 | 10 | 60 | 27" | 1280 720 | ACR06D7 VG271U |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2678 v31stBench 67%, 867 samples | 13x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v31stBench 68%, 414 samples | 8x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2696 v41stBench 71%, 283 samples | 7x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 11x |
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples | 9x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 8x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Good | Total price: $485 |