Samsung 450R4E/450R5E/450R4V/450R5V/4450RV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 46% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemSamsung 450R4E/450R5E/450R4V/450R5V/4450RV  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP450R5E-X04RU
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140429
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 06 '21 at 20:52
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 94%
CPU Throttled 46%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
29.9% Poor
Memory 48.4
1-Core 22.7
2-Core 43.1
26% 38.1 Pts
4-Core 66.6
8-Core 74.6
9% 70.6 Pts
64-Core 81.4
5% 81.4 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C711) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.2963
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
1.84% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 1
Parallax 1.6
2% 1.6 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.33 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.84%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR052
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 182 179 158 180 189 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.2% Below average
Read 186
Write 178
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 166
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 14.9
4K Mixed 2.9
33% 10.7 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 24.2
52% 105 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 92%
Kingston DT 101 II 16GB
11GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 4.6 6.6 6.7 6.8 6.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
5% Terrible
Read 16.8
Write 6.8
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 5.9
10% 8.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
22% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273EB0-CK0 859B CT51264BF160B.C16F 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
33.3% Below average
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 13.6
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 7.1
19% 6.57 GB/s
Latency 167
24% 167 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 450R4E/450R5E/450R4V/450R5V/4450RV Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 450R4E/450R5E/450R4V/450R5V/4450RV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $128
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback