Asrock FM2A55M-DGS

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	25.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock FM2A55M-DGS (all builds)
Memory	4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161130
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 17 '21 at 12:52
Run Duration	198 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-5600K APU-$250 14,744 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	58.8% Above average	Memory 82.7 1-Core 67.7 2-Core 126 57% 92.3 Pts	4-Core 205 8-Core 202 27% 204 Pts	64-Core 202 12% 202 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362 42,960 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 3563) 3GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (64^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	25.9% Poor	Lighting 31.5 Reflection 29.5 Parallax 41.2 26% 34.1 fps	MRender 38.2 Gravity 30.3 Splatting 29.9 26% 32.8 fps
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 29%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 8.2 67 6.5 4.8 9.4 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	31.9% Below average	Read 184 Write 124 Mixed 140 SusWrite 31.1 27% 120 MB/s	4K Read 20.8 4K Write 35.2 4K Mixed 16.1 71% 24 MB/s	DQ Read 19.9 DQ Write 40.5 DQ Mixed 19.3 18% 26.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 85%
Hitachi HDS723020BLE640 2TB 3,261 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX4OAAB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 172 177 176 177 177 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 184 Write 169 Mixed 28.4 SusWrite 176 100% 139 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 150% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown AE34G1339U2 8GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 667, 667 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	33.6% Below average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 10.9 32% 11.2 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 11 26% 9.17 GB/s	Latency 75.7 53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 69: 8R 7G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
69%	35%	65	236	82	60	21.6"	1920 1080	PHLC081 Philips 226VL

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FM2A55M-DGS Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A55M-DGS

CPU
A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples	16x
A4-5300 APUAMD $36Bench 40%, 7,032 samples	6x
A10-5700 APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $265Bench 48%, 6,606 samples	3x

GPU
HD 7790AMDBench 20%, 8,590 samples	12x
Radeon HD 7480DAMDBench 2%, 8,289 samples	5x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	2x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	5x
PM830 mSATA 128GBSamsungBench 54%, 663 samples	4x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	11x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	2x
BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 8GBUnknownBench 40%, 643 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $147

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16