EVGA 134-KS-E377

Performance Results


Gaming 103% UFO	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 95% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	86.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	EVGA 134-KS-E377 (all builds)
Memory	10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180820
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 16 '21 at 19:23
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$193 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	85.1% Excellent	Memory 75.3 1-Core 125 2-Core 270 84% 157 Pts	4-Core 510 8-Core 773 80% 641 Pts	64-Core 991 61% 991 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6696) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	122% Outstanding	Lighting 162 Reflection 185 Parallax 176 132% 174 fps	MRender 132 Gravity 178 Splatting 123 117% 145 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk X400 512GB-$99 7,913 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 300GB free (System drive) Firmware: X4140000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 254 249 255 250 254 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	86.7% Excellent	Read 479 Write 355 Mixed 212 SusWrite 248 72% 323 MB/s	4K Read 27.1 4K Write 81.7 4K Mixed 32.1 126% 47 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 260 DQ Mixed 203 183% 280 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 86.7% Great: 104%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$56 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 854GB free Firmware: AX003J SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 101 102 103 102 105 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	58.1% Above average	Read 100 Write 101 Mixed 34.3 SusWrite 102 61% 84.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMK16GX4M4A2666C16 029E CMK16GX4M4A2666C16 029E CMK16GX4M4A2666C16 04CD F4-2666C15-4GRR 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	69% Good	MC Read 25 MC Write 27.2 MC Mixed 21.7 70% 24.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 28.1 SC Mixed 20.9 61% 21.2 GB/s	Latency 89.6 45% 89.6 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	12	10	165	27"	1280 720	AUS2722 VG27A

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 134-KS-E377 Builds (Compare 369 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 111%

UFO

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

Motherboard: EVGA 134-KS-E377

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $193Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	195x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	57x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	29x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	63x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	47x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	23x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	24x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	19x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	15x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	21x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 2x8GBUnknownBench 79%, 17,908 samples	15x
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 92%, 30,689 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $758

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16