Toshiba SATELLITE L755

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE L755 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel Base Board Product Name
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111230
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 12 '21 at 18:28
Run Duration	197 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225 51,836 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	53.6% Above average	Memory 75.1 1-Core 77.7 2-Core 122 56% 91.6 Pts	4-Core 187 8-Core 188 25% 188 Pts	64-Core 186 12% 186 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520M 5,654 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Toshiba(1179 FC50) 1GB CLim: 740 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.25 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	1.79% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 4.1 Parallax 0.5 2% 2.23 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 2.1 2% 2.43 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.79% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Netac 120GB 120GB 1,949 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: FW200918 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 36 51 57 42 84 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	48.4% Average	Read 443 Write 352 Mixed 330 SusWrite 55.3 66% 295 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 41.6 4K Mixed 9.7 65% 23.7 MB/s	DQ Read 141 DQ Write 249 DQ Mixed 15.8 63% 135 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT51264BF160BJ.M8F Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 8GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	46.5% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 16.7 MC Mixed 15 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 14.7 SC Mixed 13 40% 13.9 GB/s	Latency 90.1 44% 90.1 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 16: 2R 1G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
16%	4%	144	19	9	60	20"	1600 900	ACR022C Acer G205HV

History: Score 31: 3R 3G 7B | Score 16: 2R 1G 3B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SATELLITE L755 Builds (Compare 508 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE L755

CPU
Core i5-2410MIntel $160Bench 48%, 46,742 samples	133x
Core i5-2450MIntel $225Bench 49%, 51,836 samples	74x
Core i3-2310MIntel $80Bench 46%, 25,542 samples	61x

GPU
GeForce GT 525MNvidiaBench 2%, 9,032 samples	262x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	112x
GeForce GT 520MNvidiaBench 2%, 5,654 samples	55x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	27x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	13x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	10x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 13,596 samples	45x
M471B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 37%, 7,983 samples	40x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $188

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16