Exper DIAMONDDEX582

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.46% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemExper DIAMONDDEX582  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK H110M-D
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170105
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateJul 05 '21 at 19:51
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$51
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 93.7
1-Core 109
2-Core 192
78% 132 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 321
38% 293 Pts
64-Core 326
20% 326 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
Sapphire(1DA2 E367) 2GB
CLim: 1256 MHz, MLim: 1775 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Relative performance (0th percentile)
6.46% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 29
Parallax 23.1
0% 17.4 fps
MRender 27.4
Gravity 17.1
Splatting 23.9
19% 22.8 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 6.46%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
409GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 152 112 108 131 152 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 180
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 135
96% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
120% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 103%
Seagate SkyHawk 1TB (2016)-$86
779GB free
Firmware: CV11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 166 161 163 164 167 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 143
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 165
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 98%
USB Mass Storage Device 128GB
101GB free, PID 168a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 7.2 6.1 7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
7.42% Terrible
Read 10.5
Write 8.3
Mixed 10
SusWrite 8.5
12% 9.32 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.6
102% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.42%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GB-$67
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
74.4% Very good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 22.6
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 22.8
65% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 60.5
66% 60.5 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 26" 1280 720 XXX0000 AAA
Typical DIAMONDDEX582 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Exper DIAMONDDEX582

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback