PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
Graphics | 74.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME Z390-A (all builds) |
Memory | 26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20201201 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 25 '21 at 03:35 |
Run Duration | 245 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 32% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i9-9900K-$409
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
|
95.2%
Outstanding
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 3060-$250
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 471.11
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
74.3%
Very good
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
597GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 327 518 578 886 587 MB/s
|
122%
Outstanding
|
|||
Micron_5300_MTFDDAK480TDS 480GB
436GB free
Firmware: D3MU001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 179 246 257 344 281 MB/s
|
45.9%
Average
|
|||
Samsung PM851 2.5 7mm 256GB
29GB free
Firmware: EXT07D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 173 215 213 252 249 MB/s
|
37.9%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$64
638GB free
Firmware: CC29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 114 120 121 126 118 MB/s
|
82.4%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
71.8%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
52% | 14% | 85 | 85 | 4 | 60 | 27" | 1920 1080 | GSM58C9 E2742 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-9700KIntel $263Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 9,216x |
Core i9-9900KIntel $409Bench 98%, 354,223 samples | 6,236x |
Core i5-9600KIntel $137Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 4,154x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 3070Nvidia $488Bench 148%, 619,642 samples | 1,971x |
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples | 1,890x |
RTX 3080Nvidia $909Bench 187%, 424,051 samples | 1,613x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $1,075 |