Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	85.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2620M 16,111 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	61.7% Good	Memory 88.8 1-Core 87.8 2-Core 159 68% 112 Pts	4-Core 203 8-Core 202 27% 202 Pts	64-Core 200 12% 200 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) 110,588 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 21CF) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.84% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 2.7 Parallax 1.6 2% 2.17 fps	MRender 2.9 Gravity 1.3 Splatting 2.8 2% 2.33 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.84% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 250G 250GB 167 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 202GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 433 395 313 345 348 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	85.2% Excellent	Read 439 Write 418 Mixed 401 SusWrite 374 92% 408 MB/s	4K Read 29.7 4K Write 49.3 4K Mixed 32.7 113% 37.2 MB/s	DQ Read 300 DQ Write 140 DQ Mixed 36.2 76% 159 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 85.2% Great: 128%
Ricoh SD Disk Device 63GB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 21GB free Firmware: 01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 33 34 32 34 34 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	32.5% Below average	Read 78.1 Write 40.5 Mixed 51.6 SusWrite 33.5 38% 50.9 MB/s	4K Read 5.6 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 1 356% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273EB0-CK0 M471B5273DH0-CK0 8GB 175 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	52.1% Above average	MC Read 18.5 MC Write 18.8 MC Mixed 16.5 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 16 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 68.7 58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	22x
NVS 4200MNvidiaBench 2%, 6,825 samples	12x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	6x

SSD
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	6x
TS128GMSA230S 128GBTranscendBench 83%, 88 samples	5x
S101 256GBFanxiangBench 63%, 810 samples	3x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 41%, 10,285 samples	7x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	3x
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 52%, 10,651 samples	3x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $165

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16