Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive50.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateJul 17 '17 at 13:48
Run Duration332 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9590-$298
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
67.3% Good
Memory 78.3
1-Core 79.9
2-Core 156
62% 105 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 502
49% 403 Pts
64-Core 499
31% 499 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6850
Gigabyte(1458 21F9) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Lighting 17.2
Reflection 13.5
Parallax 14.4
14% 15 fps
MRender 11.4
Gravity 11.4
Splatting 17.2
11% 13.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41100RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 312
Write 188
Mixed 202
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 35
4K Mixed 13.3
77% 25.2 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 69.4
DQ Mixed 41.1
46% 80.5 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 101%
Kingston SSDNow V+200 Series 120GB
108GB free
Firmware: 502ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.3% Average
Read 194
Write 118
Mixed 141
33% 151 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 46.3
4K Mixed 13.5
73% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 95.3
DQ Mixed 37.8
48% 85.3 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
11GB free
Firmware: CC27 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 113
Write 115
Mixed 110
85% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 1.47
4K Mixed 0.32
94% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 114%
Seagate ST3250820AS 250GB-$60
7GB free
Firmware: 3.AAD Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 62.8
Write 61.8
Mixed 60.8
47% 61.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
94% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 44%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
2GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 65.1
Write 67.2
Mixed 65.5
50% 65.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.81
4K Write 2.18
4K Mixed 0.28
105% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 84%
SONY WALKMAN 64GB
55GB free, PID 0b79
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 17.6
Write 7.74
Mixed 11.4
14% 12.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.77
4K Write 1.83
4K Mixed 1.02
107% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905474-060.A00LF 99U5474-016.A00LF 9905474-060.A00LF 9905474-060.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.9% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 14.8
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 12.1
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 83.7
48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,065 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $609
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback