Asus P7P55D

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	16.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P7P55D (all builds)
Memory	1.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111020
Uptime	2.6 Days
Run Date	Apr 25 '21 at 12:51
Run Duration	221 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	96%

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-750-$72 43,796 User benchmarks, average bench 62% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.75 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	29.8% Poor	Memory 44.1 1-Core 23.4 2-Core 49.6 26% 39 Pts	4-Core 87.1 8-Core 109 13% 98.1 Pts	64-Core 101 6% 101 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200 83,027 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Asus(1043 04E3) CLim: 1010 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.4% Poor	Lighting 41.9 Reflection 43.5 Parallax 18.7 34% 34.7 fps	MRender 11.7 Gravity 15.9 Splatting 31.1 17% 19.6 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 166GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 30 49 48 49 50 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	16.5% Very poor	Read 111 Write 152 Mixed 102 SusWrite 44.8 23% 102 MB/s	4K Read 7.7 4K Write 8.7 4K Mixed 7 25% 7.8 MB/s	DQ Read 27.3 DQ Write 44.8 DQ Mixed 33.7 26% 35.3 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 124%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 25GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 51 52 50 50 51 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	29.1% Poor	Read 50.5 Write 50.2 Mixed 41.9 SusWrite 50.5 36% 48.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 108% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 59%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 162GB free Firmware: 50.0AB50 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 77 80 76 77 81 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	44% Average	Read 75.4 Write 74.2 Mixed 49.5 SusWrite 78 51% 69.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 59%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 86GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 52 55 56 57 70 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	33.9% Below average	Read 61 Write 57.3 Mixed 46.6 SusWrite 56.9 41% 55.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 67%
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 3TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 47GB free, PID 2551 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 24 22 22 24 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Read 28.7 Write 23.8 Mixed 23.6 SusWrite 22.9 33% 24.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	16% Very poor	MC Read 5.5 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 5.5 17% 5.8 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 2.4 8% 2.83 GB/s	Latency 184 22% 184 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7P55D Builds (Compare 1,217 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D

CPU
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	398x
Core i7 860Intel $320Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	253x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	178x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	62x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	55x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	45x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	61x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	29x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	28x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	402x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	379x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	168x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $159

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16