Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	5.21% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	92.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Toshiba Satellite L850 (all builds)
Motherboard	Type2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory	6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130325
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Jul 08 '17 at 02:13
Run Duration	402 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52 79,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	59.7% Above average	Memory 84.7 1-Core 85.4 2-Core 149 64% 106 Pts	4-Core 203 8-Core 203 27% 203 Pts	64-Core 204 13% 204 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7670M 910 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Toshiba(1179 FB31) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.932.5.3000 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	5.21% Terrible	Lighting 6.63 Reflection 6.5 Parallax 5.31 5% 6.15 fps	MRender 6.14 Gravity 4.77 Splatting 6.52 5% 5.81 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.21% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 117GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 324 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 137 (B1) Unknown 99 99 2 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 56 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 8 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1109036580	92.9% Outstanding	Read 504 Write 405 Mixed 415 98% 441 MB/s	4K Read 36.3 4K Write 44.6 4K Mixed 28.6 115% 36.5 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 209 DQ Mixed 115 134% 235 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 92.9% Great: 124%
Verbatim STORE N GO 16GB 162 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 3GB free, PID 4200 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	2.79% Terrible	Read 11.1 Write 3.05 Mixed 3.89 6% 6.02 MB/s	4K Read 2.07 4K Write 0.006 4K Mixed 0.003 8% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.79% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5469-041.A00LF Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 8GB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	55% Above average	MC Read 19.6 MC Write 20.3 MC Mixed 18 55% 19.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 15.5 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 72.3 55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon HD 7600MAMDBench 4%, 7,895 samples	47x
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	25x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	3x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 50%, 11,714 samples	5x
M471B5273CH0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 5,120 samples	4x
M471B5773CHS-CK0 M471B5173BH0-CK0 6GBSamsungBench 38%, 429 samples	3x

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $80

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16