PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 304Ah |
Memory | 9.6 GB free of 12.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20110714 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Apr 05 '21 at 23:50 |
Run Duration | 213 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 8% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
46.1%
Average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 650 Ti Boost-$140
EVGA(3842 3657) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.30
|
16.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP2OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 44 47 49 53 56 MB/s
|
30.7%
Below average
|
|||
WD WD3200AVVS-63L2B0 320GB
10GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 35 35 45 51 42 MB/s
|
22.3%
Poor
|
|||
WD My Passport 0820 1TB
36GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 51 50 49 50 50 MB/s
|
24%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate Expansion 4TB
924GB free, PID 231a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 56 56 55 58 58 MB/s
|
33.2%
Below average
|
|||
Mass Storage Device 640GB
90GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
|
12.5%
Very poor
|
|||
WD My Passport 0827 2TB
957GB free, PID 0827
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s
|
11.6%
Very poor
|
|||
WD 312CS External 500GB
386GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
|
13.8%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 388x |
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 73x |
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 61x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 285x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 65x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 56x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 30x |
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples | 18x |
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples | 17x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $98 |