Intel X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIntel X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 31 '21 at 11:00
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User MKD-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2420 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 74.5
1-Core 61.6
2-Core 126
53% 87.3 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 357
37% 296 Pts
64-Core 444
28% 444 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 3681) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Lighting 21.1
Reflection 18
Parallax 20.8
17% 20 fps
MRender 25.3
Gravity 23
Splatting 16.6
17% 21.6 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 444
Write 375
Mixed 389
90% 403 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 52.5
4K Mixed 21.6
90% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 1.1
58% 135 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 85%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$22
59GB free
Firmware: 05.06H05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 62 63 63 62 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
29.1% Poor
Read 38.6
Write 63.6
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 62.3
38% 51.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 59%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB
10GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 5 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
3.11% Terrible
Read 9.7
Write 5
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 5
7% 6 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.11%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.4% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 6.9
20% 7.07 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 5.8
19% 6.77 GB/s
Latency 91.5
44% 91.5 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 535 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $107
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback