HCL QSSC-S4R

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Memory56GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 56GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemHCL QSSC-S4R  (all builds)
MotherboardQCI QSSC-S4R
Memory52.8 GB free of 56 GB @ 1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20101216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 22 '21 at 03:03
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X7542
CPU1, 4 CPU, 24 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
44.4% Average
Memory 59.4
1-Core 28.4
2-Core 64.2
34% 50.7 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 491
36% 324 Pts
64-Core 1,606
99% 1,606 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adaptec Array 899GB
822GB free
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 148 147 145 147 157 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Adaptec Array 300GB
240GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 111 115 116 115 114 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 33% Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 14x4GB
14 of 64 slots used
56GB DIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.6% Very poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 5.3
18% 6.2 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 2.2
SC Mixed 2.5
8% 2.73 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback