Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 350-$199 14,351 User benchmarks, average bench 38% Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	43.2% Average	Memory 62.2 1-Core 56.4 2-Core 93.3 44% 70.6 Pts	4-Core 142 8-Core 142 19% 142 Pts	64-Core 142 9% 142 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 335M 977 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 1422) 1GB Driver: Ver. 21.21.13.4201 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	3% Terrible	Lighting 3.7 Reflection 6.4 Parallax 1.6 3% 3.9 fps	MRender 4.9 Gravity 3.6 Splatting 2.8 3% 3.77 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
JAJS300M240C 240GB 1,437 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 181GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2200SC6A SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 218 214 219 219 221 MB/s Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	52.2% Above average	Read 238 Write 225 Mixed 195 SusWrite 217 49% 219 MB/s	4K Read 16.1 4K Write 32.3 4K Mixed 21.1 69% 23.2 MB/s	DQ Read 188 DQ Write 172 DQ Mixed 159 125% 173 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ASU1333D3S9DR8/2G 80AD HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 6GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1067, 1067 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	22.8% Poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 8.8 22% 7.8 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 5.9 16% 5.77 GB/s	Latency 121 33% 121 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 30%

Sail boat

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	15x
GeForce GT 335MNvidiaBench 3%, 977 samples	4x

SSD
CS900 480GBPNY $42Bench 79%, 17,946 samples	2x
AS340 120GBApacerBench 67%, 5,956 samples	2x
TS120GSSD220S 120GBTranscendBench 70%, 8,401 samples	1x

RAM
SSY3128M8-EDJED Kingston ASU1333D3S9DR8/2G 3GBUnknownBench 21%, 15 samples	2x
HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 Kingston ASU1333D3S9DR8/2G 6GBUnknownBench 23%, 5 samples	2x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 25,458 samples	1x

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $42

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16