Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics53.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210118
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateMar 14 '21 at 19:01
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 93.3
1-Core 168
2-Core 332
107% 198 Pts
4-Core 650
8-Core 1,258
113% 954 Pts
64-Core 2,300
142% 2,300 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 107%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.2% Above average
Lighting 65.6
Reflection 99.1
Parallax 61.9
54% 75.5 fps
MRender 67.2
Gravity 66.4
Splatting 60.5
52% 64.7 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SABRENT 1TB
734GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT303.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1556 1008 1009 1011 1009 1008 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 137 139 138 140 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 69
Write 104
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 138
70% 95.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
76% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 164 169 169 164 170 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 70.9
Write 128
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 166
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.5
208% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 90%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB
2TB free, PID 1351
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 109 110 111 111 111 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61% Good
Read 142
Write 146
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 110
159% 120 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.7
212% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 61%
Great: 63%
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 111 111 111 112 112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
55% Above average
Read 174
Write 144
Mixed 79.6
SusWrite 111
163% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 55%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB-$73
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
125% Outstanding
MC Read 65.8
MC Write 41.3
MC Mixed 34.2
135% 47.1 GB/s
SC Read 30.1
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 37.2
87% 30.4 GB/s
Latency 61.4
65% 61.4 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 125%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,048 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $479

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,725
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback