PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 1.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Compaq 8200 Elite USDT PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1496 |
Memory | 1.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20111110 |
Uptime | 6 Days |
Run Date | Mar 12 '21 at 04:00 |
Run Duration | 238 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 14% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
|
66.7%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel HD 3000 (Desktop V1 1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 1496) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
|
1.51%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 5.7 4.3 4.8 7.6 7.9 MB/s
|
10.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Microsoft Virtual Disk 34GB
23GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.5 0.8 1.1 5.1 7.5 7.9 MB/s
|
5.65%
Terrible
|
|||
Generic Mass-Storage 8GB
6GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 4.3 4.4 4 4.4 4.4 MB/s
|
4.34%
Terrible
|
|||
Generic Mass-Storage 16GB
15GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 8.3 8.4 8.4 8.4 8.4 MB/s
|
8.79%
Terrible
|
|||
Mass Storage Device 500GB
312GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 17 18 18 18 MB/s
|
11.9%
Very poor
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16
27GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 18 13 MB/s
|
18.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M471B5273DH0-YK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
41.1%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2400SIntel $70Bench 60%, 10,987 samples | 137x |
Core i5-2500SIntelBench 64%, 3,031 samples | 40x |
Core i3-2120Intel $170Bench 51%, 77,810 samples | 28x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 266x |
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples | 3x |
Radeon R9 M200XAMDBench 10%, 678 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 69% - Good | Total price: $98 |