Asus H87M-E

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H87M-E (all builds)
Memory	17.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131202
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 22 '17 at 22:29
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	87%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4570-$99 129,272 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	55% Above average	Memory 74.3 1-Core 69.4 2-Core 155 58% 99.6 Pts	4-Core 196 8-Core 274 30% 235 Pts	64-Core 283 18% 283 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% MSI(1462 3281) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 382.53 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.6% Poor	Lighting 21.6 Reflection 51.5 Parallax 59.2 18% 44.1 fps	MRender 66.6 Gravity 66.4 Splatting 61.6 53% 64.9 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: 521ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 55557246 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 68161130998512 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1793 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 128 (B1) Unknown 0 0 2 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 26 37 68721901594 (C2) HDA temperature 26 37 68721901594 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 55557246 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 55557246 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 55557246 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 98 98 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 20979 (EA) Unknown 0 0 11919 (F1) Unknown 0 0 11919 (F2) Unknown 0 0 18879	68.2% Good	Read 511 Write 189 Mixed 259 70% 320 MB/s	4K Read 26.1 4K Write 66.9 4K Mixed 17.2 97% 36.8 MB/s	DQ Read 158 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 61.2 78% 136 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC27 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 99 3058496 (03) Spinup time 94 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1942 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 60 56 545599968418 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 10920 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1779 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 3 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 69 56 521404447 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 122 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 45 45 111140 (C2) HDA temperature 31 44 64424509471 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -122256244070920 (F1) Unknown 100 253 69505428187 (F2) Unknown 100 253 94783803148	99.3% Outstanding	Read 171 Write 176 Mixed 150 124% 166 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 1.18 4K Mixed 0.31 71% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 99.3% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1866C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/8GX KHX1866C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/8GX 24GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	45.1% Average	MC Read 15.2 MC Write 17.7 MC Mixed 15.1 46% 16 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 14.2 SC Mixed 12.9 34% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 91.8 44% 91.8 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87M-E Builds (Compare 856 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-E - $129

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	196x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	128x
Core i5-4440Intel $128Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	77x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	87x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	45x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	40x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	44x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	25x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	24x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	35x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	25x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $247

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16