Packard imedia S3850

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Packard imedia S3850 (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard imedia S3850
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110331
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Mar 06 '21 at 17:02
Run Duration	259 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2100-$49 63,701 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	63.9% Good	Memory 93 1-Core 68.2 2-Core 145 63% 102 Pts	4-Core 204 8-Core 205 27% 204 Pts	64-Core 206 13% 206 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 420 9,903 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sapphire(174B 2162) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 266.84 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	1.75% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 3.8 Parallax 1.8 2% 2.57 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 1.8 Splatting 2 2% 2.27 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.75% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD10EADX-00TDHB0 1TB 12,976 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 431GB free (System drive) Firmware: 77.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 24 30 52 39 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	24.9% Poor	Read 54 Write 54.3 Mixed 47 SusWrite 32.4 35% 46.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 24.9% Great: 57%
WD 20EADS External 2TB 284 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 371GB free, PID 1003 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 5.5 5.5 5.6 5.9 5.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	10.3% Very poor	Read 30.1 Write 19.3 Mixed 19.8 SusWrite 5.6 23% 18.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 20%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 731GB free, PID 1048 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 5.5 5.6 5.7 5.9 6.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	10.8% Very poor	Read 29.1 Write 19.5 Mixed 18.5 SusWrite 5.7 22% 18.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 76% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 44%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 367GB free, PID 10b8 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 5.5 5.5 5.7 5.9 5.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	7.52% Terrible	Read 29.9 Write 19.8 Mixed 18 SusWrite 5.6 22% 18.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.4 36% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 7.52% Great: 44%
Toshiba StorE HDD 1.5TB 105 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 471GB free, PID 0b16 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 5.6 5.6 5.7 5.9 5.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	10.4% Very poor	Read 30.1 Write 13.8 Mixed 20.8 SusWrite 5.7 21% 17.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 19%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 538GB free, PID 1042 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 5.5 5.6 5.7 5.9 5.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	11.3% Very poor	Read 30.6 Write 19.8 Mixed 21.6 SusWrite 5.6 24% 19.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 43%
LaCie P9230 4TB 54 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2.5TB free, PID 106e Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.7 5.9 5.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	10.8% Very poor	Read 31.1 Write 19.8 Mixed 20.5 SusWrite 5.7 24% 19.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 63%
WD My Passport 0820 1.5TB 683 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 893GB free, PID 0820 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 5.5 5.6 5.7 5.9 6.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	7.57% Terrible	Read 30.1 Write 19.8 Mixed 17.3 SusWrite 5.7 22% 18.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.6 43% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 7.57% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	51.4% Above average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 18.4 MC Mixed 16.3 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 15.6 SC Mixed 16 43% 15.2 GB/s	Latency 62.1 64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical imedia S3850 Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Packard imedia S3850

CPU
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	19x
Core i5-2300IntelBench 64%, 19,722 samples	14x
Core i7-2600Intel $192Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	7x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	13x
GeForce 405NvidiaBench 1%, 1,861 samples	7x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	6x

SSD
MX500 250GBCrucial $40Bench 101%, 77,177 samples	4x
SSD Plus 120GBSanDisk $42Bench 58%, 87,912 samples	3x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	2x

RAM
GU512303EP0202 GU512303EP0202 HU564403EP0200 8GBUnifosaBench 29%, 6 samples	4x
GU512303EP0202 2x2GBUnifosaBench 35%, 775 samples	3x
M378B5773CH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 42%, 3,379 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $89

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16