Samsung 730U3E/740U3E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemSamsung 730U3E/740U3E  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP740U3E-K01UB
Memory4.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140226
Uptime22.7 Days
Run DateMar 05 '21 at 17:46
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 36%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3337U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
43.1% Average
Memory 73.1
1-Core 38.6
2-Core 66.1
41% 59.3 Pts
4-Core 77.4
8-Core 92.9
11% 85.2 Pts
64-Core 77.7
5% 77.7 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0E8) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.91% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 2.7
3% 2.7 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.2
3% 3.43 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.91%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SDMSATA512G 512GB
329GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X3310000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 205 200 177 173 186 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 288
Write 294
Mixed 133
SusWrite 193
51% 227 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 30.8
4K Mixed 19.6
58% 20.3 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 136
114% 168 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273EB0-CK0 M471B1G73DB0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
31.4% Below average
MC Read 10
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 12.4
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 4.4
11% 3.9 GB/s
Latency 94.5
42% 94.5 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 730U3E/740U3E Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 730U3E/740U3E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback