PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 51.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | MSI MS-7756 |
Motherboard | MSI H77MA-G43 (MS-7756) (all builds) |
Memory | 11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit farver |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20131029 |
Uptime | 12.6 Days |
Run Date | Feb 23 '21 at 10:38 |
Run Duration | 158 Seconds |
Run User | DNK-User |
Background CPU | 7% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
67.2%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1968 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
51.9%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
675GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 419 424 430 433 428 MB/s
|
100%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
324GB free
Firmware: 12.01C02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 97 98 99 99 98 MB/s
|
51.9%
Above average
|
|||
WD Elements 1TB
742GB free, PID 10a8
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 16 19 18 17 16 MB/s
|
9.12%
Terrible
|
|||
Hitachi HTS545032B9A300 320GB
236GB free, PID ce22
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 24 21 23 17 19 MB/s
|
7.84%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
49%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 88x |
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 54x |
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples | 47x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 29x |
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 27x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 27x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $494 |