Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics34.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170113
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJun 11 '17 at 13:55
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Memory 95.1
1-Core 125
2-Core 260
90% 160 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 817
82% 665 Pts
64-Core 1,023
63% 1,023 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
Nvidia(10DE 0969) 2GB
CLim: 1252 MHz, MLim: 1577 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Lighting 42.1
Reflection 38.7
Parallax 50.7
34% 43.8 fps
MRender 51.9
Gravity 47.4
Splatting 36.1
36% 45.2 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 1TB-$95
423GB free
Firmware: M0CR040 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 469
Write 332
Mixed 336
84% 379 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 35
4K Mixed 24.3
81% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 44.6
69% 130 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 105%
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
83GB free
Firmware: DXT0AB0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 493
Write 130
Mixed 172
57% 265 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 49.8
4K Mixed 10.1
75% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 27.4
52% 105 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 73%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 497
Write 239
Mixed 372
82% 369 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 40.7
4K Mixed 11.6
67% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 16.4
DQ Write 74.8
DQ Mixed 11.1
19% 34.1 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSA.16FAR 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
125% Outstanding
MC Read 44.5
MC Write 56
MC Mixed 47.4
141% 49.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 21.7
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 56.9
70% 56.9 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 125%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,293 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $352
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback