Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	56.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION (all builds)
Memory	3.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131023
Uptime	10 Days
Run Date	Jan 26 '21 at 04:12
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4930K-$90 22,204 User benchmarks, average bench 77% LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	65.6% Good	Memory 75.5 1-Core 91.2 2-Core 167 65% 111 Pts	4-Core 301 8-Core 437 46% 369 Pts	64-Core 502 31% 502 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410 30,815 User benchmarks, average bench 53% PNY(196E 100A) 3GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 460.79 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	56.4% Above average	Lighting 79 Reflection 1.1 Parallax 70.1 64% 50.1 fps	MRender 55.3 Gravity 54.3 Splatting 43.4 41% 51 fps
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 59%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Neutron GTX 240GB-$503 3,421 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 107GB free (System drive) Firmware: M311 SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 228 245 229 235 232 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	65.5% Good	Read 371 Write 351 Mixed 147 SusWrite 237 62% 276 MB/s	4K Read 17.3 4K Write 34.5 4K Mixed 21.1 72% 24.3 MB/s	DQ Read 324 DQ Write 308 DQ Mixed 239 201% 290 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 100%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199 23,857 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 334GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 290 289 262 46 93 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	71.3% Very good	Read 330 Write 276 Mixed 266 SusWrite 209 61% 270 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 48.3 4K Mixed 36.5 112% 37.1 MB/s	DQ Read 250 DQ Write 194 DQ Mixed 179 146% 207 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 126%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 909GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 146 150 151 153 153 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	77.7% Very good	Read 121 Write 117 Mixed 62.5 SusWrite 150 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.2 226% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 77.7% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB 73 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	38.4% Below average	MC Read 14.5 MC Write 13.1 MC Mixed 12.9 39% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 10.8 SC Mixed 8.2 28% 9.7 GB/s	Latency 89.3 45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 70%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 65%

Destroyer

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

RAM
HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GBKingstonBench 70%, 5,910 samples	16x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 67%, 24,592 samples	12x
Vengeance DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 64%, 1,972 samples	12x

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $421

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16