PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 23.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 3396 |
Memory | 9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120615 |
Uptime | 2.4 Days |
Run Date | Jan 18 '21 at 03:02 |
Run Duration | 122 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 64% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
62.1%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Gigabyte(1458 3765) 2GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
23.8%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD WD5000ABYS-01TNA0 500GB-$80
344GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 12.01C01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 56 58 63 63 64 MB/s
|
34.5%
Below average
|
|||
WD WD5000ABYS-01TNA0 500GB-$80
326GB free
Firmware: 12.01C01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 73 73 74 73 74 MB/s
|
42.6%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
37.9%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 1,041x |
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 966x |
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 400x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 381x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 336x |
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples | 209x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $325 |